Facility identity
Confirm the visited address, company or site name, contact and stated relationship to the order where evidence is available.
Facility and process assessment
A China factory audit provides a structured view of an identified production facility, its observable workflow, resources, quality arrangements and available records.
The audit scope should reflect the product and buyer decision. A site visit can document what is observable and supported at the time, but it should not turn limited evidence into certification, compliance or guaranteed-capacity claims.
Service role
Factory audit services in China are relevant when the buyer needs more than company contact details or a sample product. The audit can examine whether the stated site is the facility visited and document observable organisation, production flow, equipment, staffing functions, storage and quality-control arrangements within the agreed scope.
The buyer should define which products, processes and risks matter. Equipment presence alone does not prove effective capacity, and a record does not prove every practice is followed consistently. Evidence should be described with its source and limitations rather than converted into unsupported conclusions.
A supplier factory audit differs from product inspection. The audit addresses facility and process capability questions; product inspection compares selected goods with order requirements. Buyers may use both when neither facility evidence nor product evidence answers the whole decision.
Buyer decision
Confirm the visited address, company or site name, contact and stated relationship to the order where evidence is available.
Observe major steps relevant to the product, material flow, work areas and how production is organised at the visit time.
Record relevant equipment and observable condition or use without treating presence as proof of output, precision or capacity.
Review stated responsibilities, incoming, in-process and final checks, nonconforming-goods handling and available records.
Ask which processes are performed onsite and which may be outsourced, then document supporting information that is available.
Review requested examples of procedures, inspection records, calibration or production documentation where available and relevant.
Scope considerations
An audit should not imply that every facility needs the same checklist or that observation proves legal compliance.
Roles, reporting lines and responsibility for production and quality may be reviewed for clarity.
Storage, identification and movement of relevant materials may be observed where accessible.
Work instructions, production steps and in-process checks may be reviewed against the product context.
Relevant machinery, tools, maintenance information and measurement equipment may be observed within scope.
Available inspection, defect, corrective-action or calibration records may be sampled for consistency and relevance.
Storage and identification practices may be observed, but this does not replace sampling and checking the buyer's actual order.
Planning sequence
Confirm the exact address, company relationship and onsite contact.
State the product, processes, risks and buyer decision the audit should inform.
List records, areas and demonstrations that would support the scope, subject to availability and access.
Separate observed facts, supplied statements, sampled records and matters that could not be confirmed.
Buyer inputs
Provide what is available and identify gaps rather than allowing assumptions to become criteria.
Clear boundaries
An audit is a time-limited assessment and does not continuously monitor the facility.
Observable equipment and records do not by themselves prove capacity, authenticity, compliance or future performance.
Access restrictions and unavailable records should be reported as limitations rather than filled with assumptions.
A factory audit does not establish conformity of the buyer's production lot; product inspection is a separate scope.
Related service guidance
Supplier verification can precede a deeper facility review, while product inspection addresses the goods themselves.
Buyer questions
No. It documents evidence within an agreed scope. Certification or compliance conclusions require appropriate standards, authority and evidence and should not be implied.
It may record equipment, workflow, staffing functions and available production information. Those observations do not guarantee actual or future capacity without sufficient supporting evidence.
No. Verification focuses on identity and information consistency. An audit goes further into the identified facility, workflow, resources, quality arrangements and records.
Not automatically. An audit assesses facility and process questions. Checking selected order units against specifications requires a product-inspection scope.
Prepare the facility questions
Bring the factory identity, address, product and process context, requested records, subcontracting concerns, known risks and buyer decision together.